Glossary entry (derived from question below)
Spanish term or phrase:
antecedentes: no contributorios
English translation:
history: noncontributory
Spanish term
antecedentes: no contributorios
"Al examen mental, se apreció al paciente alerta, orientado globalmente, memoria sin alteraciones, lenguaje fluido y coherente, pensamiento: ideas obsesivas y compulsiones, verbatum del paciente: “tengo necesidad de tocarme los puntos rojos y azules en los dedos… también me ocurre cuando veo rallas [sic], también con los volúmenes y con la simetría… tengo necesidad de ordenarlos”, sensopercepción sin alteraciones. Afecto: poco expresivo, discreta hipertimia hacia la tristeza. Juicio: conservado. Conciencia de enfermedad mental. **Antecedentes: no contributorios**. Por tal motivo se indica tratamiento con antidepresivo, ansiolítico e inductor del sueño.
Muchas gracias por adelantado
5 +4 | history: noncontributory |
Joseph Tein
![]() |
4 | background: unrevealing (non informative) |
Ellen Kraus
![]() |
Non-PRO (1): philgoddard
When entering new questions, KudoZ askers are given an opportunity* to classify the difficulty of their questions as 'easy' or 'pro'. If you feel a question marked 'easy' should actually be marked 'pro', and if you have earned more than 20 KudoZ points, you can click the "Vote PRO" button to recommend that change.
How to tell the difference between "easy" and "pro" questions:
An easy question is one that any bilingual person would be able to answer correctly. (Or in the case of monolingual questions, an easy question is one that any native speaker of the language would be able to answer correctly.)
A pro question is anything else... in other words, any question that requires knowledge or skills that are specialized (even slightly).
Another way to think of the difficulty levels is this: an easy question is one that deals with everyday conversation. A pro question is anything else.
When deciding between easy and pro, err on the side of pro. Most questions will be pro.
* Note: non-member askers are not given the option of entering 'pro' questions; the only way for their questions to be classified as 'pro' is for a ProZ.com member or members to re-classify it.
Proposed translations
history: noncontributory
This is the language a psychologist/psychiatrist would use in a report.
"Case 1 Clinical history 2-year-old boy with a history of left head tilt Past medical history: noncontributory Family history: noncontributory, negative for ..."
Something went wrong...