https://connect.proz.com/kudoz/spanish-to-english/law-general/7215704-acreditar-su-necesaria-proyecci%C3%B3n.html
This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential to the operation of the site, while others help to improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used. For more information, please see the ProZ.com privacy policy.
Cookie settings
"auto de apertura a prueba"
SEM I PRES/PROGRAMA
Apr 20 13:33
18 days ago
Spanish term

acreditar su necesaria proyección

Spanish to English Law/Patents Law (general)
Estoy traduciendo una demanda laboral de Argentina y aparece la frase en cuestión en el siguiente contexto: "La pérdida de confianza no constituye una causal autónimoa de despido susceptible de ser admitida apriorísticamente y en abstracto, eximiendo a quien la invoque de acreditar su necesaria proyección en una conducta injuriosa, concreta y puntual cuya gravedad habilite la disolución directa del vínculo".
Desde ya, muchas gracias!
Proposed translations (English)
3 show evidence of its necessary embodiment (enactment) in..
3 +4 that excuses a complainant who seeks to rely on it ...
4 +1 proving its necessary influence
4 show that it necessarily constituted
3 -2 legal authorization of necessary continuation

Discussion

Adrian MM. Apr 22:
AB stikes agains Oliver Toogood alias Andrew Bramhall aka Sylvie 'Foxy' Renaud has again fallen into my trap set of a ref. with 'necessary influence' as an (inadequate) answer not on all fours with the 'projection' in hand.
patinba Apr 21:
My understanding I think Paul's proposal is probably the closest, but the paragraph needs to be seen as a whole for the best answer:


Loss of trust does not constitute sufficient empirical, abstract grounds for dismissal, absolving the party that invokes it from the need to demonstrate that the reasons behind it led to specific, detailed, damaging conduct so serious as to justify termination of the employment link.
Charles Davis Apr 20:
That sentence was not composed by Adrian. It is a quotation from a paper by one Alexa Hepburn entitled "Managing Embodied Misconduct: Burping and Spitting in Family Mealtime Interactions". I leave it to others to judge its relevance to the present context.
Andrew Bramhall Apr 20:
Pseuds'Corner Entry No.94 "The goal of this paper has been to navigate the procedural unfolding of sequences of embodied misconduct" ( © AMM 2025)

Proposed translations

19 mins
Spanish term (edited): acreditar su necesaria proyección en...
Selected

show evidence of its necessary embodiment (enactment) in..

una causal autónimoa -> autónoma ?

eximiendo a quien la invoque de acreditar su necesaria proyección en una conducta ... : exempting the party relying on (pleading) such to show any proof of its (self-standing / independent causation) necessarily embodied in .... (mis-)conduct.

I've 'needfully' included 'enactment' in the answer, just in case anyone tries again to lift that part of my answer.
Example sentence:

Conforme lo ha precisado la Sala, la falsa motivación es una causal autónoma que se relaciona directamente con el principio de legalidad de los actos

The goal of this paper has been to navigate the procedural unfolding of sequences of embodied misconduct-

Reference:

http://www.proz.com/personal-glossaries/entry/15870446-proyección-scope-scale-impact-new-actions

http://www.proz.com/kudoz/spanish-to-english/business-commerce-general/835381-su-proyección-dentro-del.html

Something went wrong...
4 KudoZ points awarded for this answer.
+1
1 hr

proving its necessary influence

‘Loss of confidence does not (in itself constitute an autonomous ground for dismissal that can be admitted a priori and in the abstract,thereby exempting the person who invokes it from proving its necessary influence in a specific and timely injurious pattern of conduct,the seriousness of which contributed the direct breakdown of the relationship’.
Peer comment(s):
agree Shaun Richards
1 day 21 hrs
Thanks !
Something went wrong...
3 hrs

show that it necessarily constituted

I feel the previous answers are slightly too literal and not instantly understandable.
Something went wrong...
-2
4 hrs

legal authorization of necessary continuation

The loss of confidence or trustworthiness does not constitute to an autonomous basis or likelihood of dismissal, which was admitted a priori (proceeding from a previously known or assumed cause to a necessarily related effect), excepting or exempting the one who prompted necessary legal authorization to continue a course of action resulting from insulting conduct, which was definitive with a seriousness that enables a direct end to a commitment.
Peer comment(s):
neutral Andrew Bramhall : You can't constitute" to" anything,and your explanation is unidiomatic.
5 hrs
disagree AllegroTrans : Your explanation does not make sense
1 day 16 hrs
disagree patinba : No sense at all.
1 day 20 hrs
Something went wrong...
+4
18 hrs

that excuses a complainant who seeks to rely on it ...

It means: that excuses a complainant who seeks to rely on it from showing as required by law that it has led to specific, harmful conduct on specific occasions
Peer comment(s):
agree Sebastian Witte
5 hrs
agree patinba : Charles is right in that "loss of confidence" cannot lead to the harm being claimed.
5 hrs
neutral Charles Davis : I think this is a good rendering, except that "led to" seems to me incorrect for "proyección". The idea is manifestation, not consequence. (There's also the repetition of "specific", but that can easily be fixed.)
5 hrs
agree AllegroTrans
5 hrs
agree Andrew Bramhall : Yes, a very good aappraisal;
11 hrs
Something went wrong...