That would be the short and sweet explanation, although I see that the awkward "energy restructuring yield results" is used in the English version of the 2011 report (see link). Enova is supposed to drive more efficient use of energy in Norway, and change-over to greener energy sources (Norway used to be mostly water-generated energy when I worked for Statnett back in the late 1990's and I am not sure what is greener than that). Thus energi resultat has to be energy savings, energy that was not spent, because implementation of Enova-supported technology and methods. Energy savings is also what American utilities call it, but Enova want to use a more positive business language, so they chose results instead. Got to love the marketing spin heads, at least they are a key driver of language innovation!