Glossary entry (derived from question below)
Mar 4, 2005 00:37
19 yrs ago
English term
hold
English
Other
Linguistics
A student of mine, wrote in a composition:
"I lived in a big house with a large kitchen that could **hold** all of us comfortably for dinner (...)"
My question is --Is "hold" a natural word choice here? Or is there any other better verb or wording?
I thought about "house" but it is too "technical" and this is a composition.
I look forward to your comments. Thanks!
Valeria
"I lived in a big house with a large kitchen that could **hold** all of us comfortably for dinner (...)"
My question is --Is "hold" a natural word choice here? Or is there any other better verb or wording?
I thought about "house" but it is too "technical" and this is a composition.
I look forward to your comments. Thanks!
Valeria
Responses
5 +2 | accommodate; hold | awilliams |
4 +2 | that could hold us all comfortably | CMJ_Trans (X) |
4 +2 | accomodate, hold | juvera |
4 +1 | seat | Alexander Demyanov |
Responses
+2
13 mins
Selected
accommodate; hold
"Hold" is fine; I thought of "seat" but that's more for a table.
"Accommodate" would be another option.
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 14 mins (2005-03-04 00:51:54 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
Sorry - didn\'t see other answers.
NB spelling of \"accommodate\"
"Accommodate" would be another option.
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 14 mins (2005-03-04 00:51:54 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
Sorry - didn\'t see other answers.
NB spelling of \"accommodate\"
Peer comment(s):
agree |
Charlie Bavington
: "hold " is absolutely fine, as is "seat", bearing in mind it's about dinner and it's doubtful they ate standing up :-)
13 mins
|
agree |
Elena Sgarbo (X)
: Yes, "hold". (Valeria: "house" as a verb would not flow very well with the rest of the text, since "house" is already used as a noun). Greetings, Amy
49 mins
|
4 KudoZ points awarded for this answer.
Comment: "Thank you all!! =)"
+1
10 mins
seat
Although "hold" is used to mean house, accomodate, etc.
Peer comment(s):
agree |
Eva Olsson
: My first thought was 'seat' =have room to sit, although 'hold' means have room for as well.
2 days 20 hrs
|
Thank you!
|
+2
7 hrs
that could hold us all comfortably
is how I would put it - I think "hold" is a good choice
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 2005-03-04 14:06:49 (GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
you could also say \"take\"
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 2005-03-04 14:06:49 (GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
you could also say \"take\"
Peer comment(s):
agree |
cmwilliams (X)
2 hrs
|
agree |
Eva Olsson
: Hold is fine. As is seat (agree with Charlie above).
2 days 12 hrs
|
+2
9 mins
accomodate, hold
You can say hold, but I would prefer to choose accomodate.
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 9 hrs 56 mins (2005-03-04 10:34:29 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
Mea culpa: accommodate. It was about 1.30 a.m. and my spelling deteriorates at around that time of the night.
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 9 hrs 56 mins (2005-03-04 10:34:29 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
Mea culpa: accommodate. It was about 1.30 a.m. and my spelling deteriorates at around that time of the night.
Peer comment(s):
agree |
Elizabeth Rudin
5 hrs
|
Thanks.
|
|
neutral |
CMJ_Trans (X)
: accoMModate
7 hrs
|
Yep, five minutes later I hit the bed, it was 1.30 in the morning, and my last thought was, I bet I spelt it wrongly!
|
|
agree |
Bjørn Anthun
: I'd say accommodate
17 hrs
|
Thank you.
|
Discussion